[this page on wiki][index][EN][BG][CS][DA][DE][EL][ES][ET][FI][FR][GA][HR][HU][IT][MT][NL][PL][PT][RO][SK][SL][SV]

Lecture: EU Human Rights Legislation

Administrative Information

Title EU Human Rights Legislation
Duration 60 minutes
Module C
Lesson Type Lecture
Focus Ethical - Compliance, Legality and Humanity
Topic EU and International Legislation/Frameworks on data, AI, human rights and equality

Keywords

human rights, privacy, anti-discrimination,

Learning Goals

Expected Preparation

Learning Events to be Completed Before

None.

Obligatory for Students

None.

Optional for Students

  • References Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius (2020) Strengthening legal protection against discrimination by algorithms and artificial intelligence, The International Journal of Human Rights; Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius (2018) Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic, Council of Europe; Philipp Hacker (2021) First Principles to the Artificial Intelligence Act, Law, Innovation and Technology; European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2018) #BigData: Discrimination in datasupported decision-making

References and background for students

None.

Recommended for Teachers

None.

Lesson materials

Instructions for Teachers

Teacher should cover the following topics:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly impact human rights across various aspects of society. As AI technology advances, it brings forth a range of regulatory challenges and considerations to ensure that these advancements align with and respect fundamental human rights. Several key human rights regulatory issues related to AI include:

1. Privacy and Data Protection: Issue: AI systems often require access to large amounts of personal data to function effectively. This raises concerns about privacy breaches and unauthorized data use. Regulatory Response: Data protection laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and similar regulations globally set standards for the collection, processing, and storage of personal data. AI developers must adhere to strict data protection principles and obtain informed consent from users.

2. Discrimination and Bias: Issue: AI algorithms can inherit biases present in training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes in areas like hiring, lending, and law enforcement. Regulatory Response: Regulations may require transparency in AI algorithms' decision-making processes. Bias audits and impact assessments can help identify and mitigate discriminatory effects. Existing anti-discrimination laws may also apply to AI systems.

3. Freedom of Expression and Information: Issue: AI's ability to manipulate and generate content raises concerns about disinformation, fake news, and censorship. Regulatory Response: Regulations might focus on transparency regarding the origin of AI-generated content and mechanisms to verify authenticity. Balancing the right to freedom of expression with the need to prevent harmful misinformation is a challenge. 4. Labor and Employment Rights:

Issue: Automation driven by AI can lead to job displacement and impact workers' rights and job security. Regulatory Response: Labor laws may need to be updated to address issues such as the retraining of displaced workers, potential changes in employment contracts due to human-AI collaborations, and ensuring fair treatment for workers affected by AI-driven changes.

5. Right to Fair Trial: Issue: AI's involvement in legal processes, such as predictive policing and sentencing algorithms, raises questions about due process and the right to a fair trial. Regulatory Response: Legal frameworks should ensure transparency and explainability of AI used in judicial decisions. They should also provide mechanisms for accountability and the ability to challenge AI-generated outcomes.

6. Surveillance and Freedom of Assembly: Issue: AI-powered surveillance technologies can infringe on citizens' rights to privacy and freedom of assembly. Regulatory Response: Striking a balance between security needs and individual rights is crucial. Regulations might limit the use of AI surveillance in certain contexts, require strict oversight, and ensure data retention limitations.

7. Access to Basic Services: Issue: AI-driven systems may be used to allocate resources and services, potentially excluding marginalized populations. Regulatory Response: Ensuring equal access to essential services while preventing digital exclusion requires regulations that mandate transparency, fairness, and the consideration of social impact in AI system design.

Outline

Duration (min) Description
15 Discrimination and Bias
15 Freedom of Expression and Information and Right to Fair Trial
15 Surveillance and Freedom of Assembly
15 Access to Basic Services

Acknowledgements

The Human-Centered AI Masters programme was Co-Financed by the Connecting Europe Facility of the European Union Under Grant №CEF-TC-2020-1 Digital Skills 2020-EU-IA-0068.